Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: summerseve Date: Aug 1, 2004 11:12pm
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: Why defend mind-less SMUT??

Believe it or not, I actually looked up the word "smut" (yeah, I have some time on my hands), and the relevant definitions are:

2a) Obscenity in speech or writing.
b) Pornography.

The film is suggestive, not pornographic. Here in the States it would barely get an "R" rating, if that.

If I ever have a son, I'm going to put this film on a loop and project it over his crib. (Sorry, just trying to get a flame war going! Ha ha)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: cashel Date: Aug 2, 2004 5:12am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: TRAFALGAR please dont put words inmy mouth I DID NOT SAY IT

I have merely said that the film which is the subject of this week,s forum is boring, stupid and cheaply made. These are statements that could made about much of Hollywood,s current output. I am certainly NOT suggesting that Hollywood be shut down.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: summerseve Date: Aug 2, 2004 10:21am
Forum: movie_of_the_week Subject: Re: TRAFALGAR please dont put words inmy mouth I DID NOT SAY IT

Words in your mouth? You called it "smut", I looked up the word and said it wasn't.
Shutting down Hollywood? As usual, you confuse me endlessly.
In any case, it's a cute, harmless little film, and I like it.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)